tags:
Television is the absolute piss of the earth. I just watched an amazing movie on IFC called “Invincible” and a major component of the soundtrack was Beethoven’s Piano Concert No. 2. Exactly as it was playing, I felt tears welling up in my eyes, like it was almost too real, like the wailing orchestra’s modulations were bouncing off my living room walls…until it got unbearable at which point, I went upstairs to find my brother playing the first violin part of Beethoven’s Piano Concert No. 2. It was ineffable. Live music is the most divine way to savor music, even if unprofessional and relaxed.
Anyway, after it was over, I got bored and tuned to VH1. It was a show called “Paris’ Most Shocking”, featuring panelists who were trying to pretend-mock Ms. Hilton for all the shit she does, veritably coming off as a dowdy, fame-thirsty, jealous homage to their princess of detached, fleeting fortune. They said “many people were upset” that she was included in Barbara Walters’ 10 Most Fascinating People of 2004. On the list, she was joined by the likes of Michael Moore, the inventors of Google (no panelist knew their names), and OPRAH. They claimed that these people “influenced society”, “unlike Paris”. The brainless part of all this nonsense is that viewers will never see that Paris is Oprah who is Michael Moore who is Barbara Walters. None of these people really care about anything, and that’s the only reason they’re allowed to permeate the media. It’s virtually impossible to know of any actually righteous member of the “public eye” because no one seen on TV has anything to say that might impinge upon the plans of the totalitarian government under which we live. If VH1 said to wear red underwear on Thursdays, I bet millions would hop on that band wagon.
The infuriating slant is that this bullshit television is preaching this ludicrous gospel right after I had a daunting realization about the human condition in a place I have never feared until now: Raven’s Crest. To preface my recognition, I must say: I don’t in any way condone hatred towards any group of people, but, I can generally see from the point of view of a heterosexual man the annoyance that comes with what is described as “flaming homosexuality”. However, if someone sporting black nail polish that didn’t so much as look in the direction of a male who I would describe as “in the deepest depths of the closet, any closet, all closets”, what conclusion would one come to about why this male was so infinitely frustrated at the mere sharing of space with this someone, who I would describe as a “straight, sensitive, music-obsessed, elitist-Goth-boy”?
Goth-boy’s name was Alex; I was the only person other than the house’s owner who bothered to actually meet him. I thought he was annoying and disgusting. When he tried to touch my hair, I screamed at the top of my lungs as if he were about brand me. In-the-deepest-depths-of-the-closet, however, could never be seen once that night without a cigarette and a limp wrist. His voice was identical to that of Graham Norton, bereft of the accent. He had the fakest tan and the nicest hair I had ever seen. Blonde bangs, swept aside, with a separation only to expose what I would describe as a “localized pathological change in a bodily organ or tissue” on his forehead. I don’t care, in this particular case, to acknowledge that one may not truly be as one initially seems; this boy was a racist, flaming, closeted homosexual who actually thought he was passing. The only time he talked to anyone in our group was to point out the “fag” with the black nail polish.
I am aware that I had smoked a ton and drank a lot, while trying to cope with the last night’s hangover, but it was the biggest bemusement, seeing how this boy worked. He approached us asking us if we’d noticed the huge fag sitting in the corner, completely keeping to himself. The others laughed and said “Yeah!”, I asserted “Is he even gay? He seemed straighter than some other guys at this ‘party’ to me.”, and he alleged “Definitely. Black nail polish. Come on!” I had no response to that, so I retorted “What’s that on your forehead?” and he shot back after one swift moment, matter-of-factly, “Scrape!” and I disputed “Really? ‘Cause it kind of looks like a lesion.” at which point he gave me a firm, solid huff and marched away. I wanted to insinuate that he had AIDS, a syndrome which someone like himself might commonly associate with gay men, but no one followed. Instead of being greeted with a barrage of praise for my observing nature, I was assaulted with a line of questioning by East Windsorites for an hour about lesions, AIDS, gay men, stereotypes and the movie Philadelphia. “What’s a lesion?” “It’s something people with AIDS get.” “Why, sweet Neeraja, do people with AIDS get lesions?” “I guess because their immune system is weak.” AND “You should just watch the movie Philadelphia, East Windsor ones, for you will much better understand what I’ve been referencing.” “Why, Mama Neerj?! I live in the REAL WORLD!” are a sampling of the back-and-forths I underwent. Hmmpf. And so began the frustration of an insidiously racist night.
I just couldn’t fight the fear that though I was living in America, and though it was more than half a century after any kind of battle of civil liberties, I was standing alone, facing an army. 15 white boys, all in uniform: solid colored polo shirt, stylishly tattered jeans, Birkenstocks, indiscernible-from-the-next-white-man hair cuts. After I yelled at Goth-boy to never touch my hair again, I had gone to the bathroom, and upon my return I was shocked to find Goth-boy gone. I turned to the two white boys who had blithely witnessed my altercation with the boy, and asked them where he was. “We got rid of him for you.” “WHAT?!” I thought they had beat him up and thrown him down the stairs or something. This boy was so drunk, even though he lived “just across the street”, I doubted that he could make it home. “He’s gonna die tonight!!!” The response from the white boys: SHRUG. (With a hint of peevish smile). I lowered myself onto the couch slowly, beginning to dig the brevity of the situation. These boys were sobering.
Scariest to me, discordantly, was the stereophonic method of choice utilized by In-the-deepest-depths-of-the-closet. No one else even bothered with Goth-boy, but this one went to all the masculine, manly, male men, spreading his obvious cover-himself-up slander, and those dolts were overjoyed to oblige, whether or not they believed their preacher was himself, gay. Too overtaken by the opportunity to show their hetero-maleality, they went along with anything that they, in their drunken, vulnerable condition, believed would help.
In “Invincible”, Tim Roth plays a member of the Nazi Party who once was a Jew which longed for a sovereign, peaceful, wealthy life. To live peacefully, he felt it necessary to abandon who he was, and essentially, hate, who he was. In 1933, I see that as a viable option to his life’s problems, however, the Tim Roth at the party, who resided deep within a deep, deep closet, had infinite options besides resenting those who, perhaps, freely do the things of which he wishes he was capable.
These are the kinds of lessons VH1, Oprah, Michael Moore, or even a closet full of D-list comedian panelists whose careers solely entail judging celebrities, a job that all humans do pro bono; can never teach. Real people are scary, and uninfluenced by the chirpy, flamboyantly ignorant ways of the “pop culture” obsessed (it’s not pop culture if it reflects no one’s culture and is inherently unpopular). As I complete this soul-wrenching recollection of my Saturday Night, I am looking out my window at probably the most inspiring sunset I’ve seen in years. I can see an actual neon pink, electric line separating the selfish, dense world of the unsullied Daylight, from the engulfing, capaciously drunken capsulation of Night. And I can’t stop hearing Beethoven’s Piano Concert No. 2.